Swiss Prosperity, Sovereignty and Independence (Schweizer Wohlstand, Souveränität und Unabhängigkeit)

SwissPSI.ch – the Prosperity, Sovereignty and Independence of Switzerland is our concern.

The creators of this site believe in the following:

– There is nothing inherently wrong with individual human-beings finding commonality with one another and thereby creating a community, state, and/or finally a nation.

– There is nothing inherently wrong with the resulting nation placing higher priority on the well-being of its own, before looking to the needs and/or demands of those not part of the nation.

– There is nothing inherently wrong with the nation, which is an extension of the sovereign man and woman who compose the nation, to be completely independent of any entities which are not part of the nation.

– Words such as “racism”, “xenophobia” and “discrimination” must never be used without seriously considering the true definitions of those words, and that the context in which these words are used must fit the the definitions. (SwissPSI.ch makes use of the Oxford Dictionary)

In respect to the above, our goal here is to explain in factual, and detailed fashion, what the immigration initiative of February 9th 2014 is – and what it is not.

Please feel free to share the information on this website with whomever you wish.

Enjoy!
– SwissPSI

 

Lukas Reimann is a Swiss parliamentarian in the National Council of Switzerland, and is a member of the SVP party.
In 2008 Mr. Reimann put forward a motion to the parliament which called for the public declaration of all meats which were the product of ritual slaughtering practices, regardless of which religion or ideology was behind the ritual practices.
In the parliamentary vote the motion was shot down with 55 YES votes and 137 NO votes. The 55 YES votes came from the SVP with 53 and the FDP with 2 - The Greens, SP and CVP all were completely opposed to it. Additionally Mr. Reimann had to put up with being labeled a 'racist' and 'Islam-hater'.
Now something very interesting has occurred - the CVP has put forward it's own motion for the very same thing, except that it only applies to Islamic ritual slaughter, and miracle of miracles the parlimentary vote swings in it's favor with 117 YES and 40 NO votes. Where did the support come from? SVP representatives voted as previously with a YES, the CVP (this being their own motion) also voted YES, and a majority of the Greens and FDP also voted YES. 'Better late than never' says Mr. Reimann.
Only the SP remain against the declaration of how ones meat is slaughtered.
... See MoreSee Less

Die Zeiten wenden sich zum Guten. Halal-Lebensmittel sind ein blühendes Millionen-Geschäft - 525 Tonnen wurden letztes Jahr importiert. Da ich kein Fleisch essen will, welches barbarisch mit Qual, Elend und ohne Betäubung hergestellt worden ist und erst recht keine solche Produktion unterstützen kann, verlangte ich 2008 eine Deklarationspflicht für Schächtware. Auf die Verbotsforderung verzichtete ich bewusst, damit das massvolle Anliegen auch durchkommt. Doch mit 55 (53 aus der SVP, 2 aus der FDP) zu 137 verlor ich die Abstimmung im Nationalrat hoch und musste mich als übler Rassist und Islam-Hasser beschimpfen lassen. 0 Zustimmung gab es von CVP, Grünen und SP. Nun stellte ein CVP-Nationalrat plötzlich die gleiche Forderung, allerdings nur für die islamische Produktion (statt generell bei allen Religionen), womit eine Hintertür offenbleibt. Und - oh Wunder - mehr als das halbe Parlament wird klüger: 117 Ja zu 40 Nein. Geschlossen stimmen SVP (100% bei der gleichen Haltung geblieben) und CVP (100% Meinungswandel) zu und plötzlich sogar eine Mehrheit von Grünen und FDP ebenso. Besser spät als nie! Einzig die SP will weiterhin, dass Konsumenten nicht wissen dürfen, wie ihr Fleisch zubereitet wurde. Da könnte man ko.....

3 days ago  ·